Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Max Purcell vs Zizou Bergs Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Purcell vs Bergs analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Max Purcell vs Zizou Bergs Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Purcell 0 - 0 Bergs
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Purcell has won 53.03% of points on their second serve, while Bergs has won 52.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Purcell, in recent form, has won 47.93% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bergs has won 50.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.52% and 32.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Purcell has saved 61.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bergs has saved 60.99% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Purcell has won 46.88% of matches played (W/L 30/ 34), with Bergs winning 67.11% (W/L 51/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Purcell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 205/ 142), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19). Bergs has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 70% (W/L 19/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 80/ 51).
- Player level: In the last year, Purcell has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 47.22% of matches (W/L 17/ 19), where as Bergs has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 76.47% of matches (W/L 26/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Purcell has played against opponents with an average rank of 187.45 while Bergs has played against players with an average rank of 266.79.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Purcell has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bergs has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Purcell has converted 33.01% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bergs has converted 40.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
94
Rank
40
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
79
Rank
77
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
58% (283-209)
Career Total W/L
63% (290-172)
49% (17-18)
YTD W/L
67% (33-16)
$1,019,430
Career Prize Money
$585,960
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Max Purcell vs Zizou Bergs For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Purcell VS Bergs
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Max Purcell | Zizou Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 49% (17/18) | 67% (33/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (41/48) | 63% (79/46) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (421/454) | 54% (644/553) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 35% (6/11) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 77% (17/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 64% (7/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 67% (6/3) |
| Aces pg | 0.6 | 0.61 |
| Aces Total | 259 | 357 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 79 | 153 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:46 | 1:56:3 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 197.37 | 299.94 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1565/2672) | 62% (2254/3639) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (1141/1565) | 73% (1655/2254) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (587/1107) | 52% (722/1385) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (69/209) | 41% (154/380) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (925/2708) | 39% (1500/3805) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 77% (10/3) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 55% (12/10) | 50% (6/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 75% (12/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (16/32) | 69% (29/42) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 57% (4/7) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 72% (13/18) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (9/13) | 56% (9/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 82% (34/28) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 18% (34/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (20/4) | 33% (15/5) |
Max Purcell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Taylor Fritz
Player
Max Purcell
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
10 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Billy Harris
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
101)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
52 of
70)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
19 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Laslo Djere
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Henry Searle
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Jan Choinski
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
13
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Max Purcell
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
14
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
2
90%
(
36 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
17
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Zizou Bergs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Denis Yevseyev
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
11
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
63 of
107)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
23 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Omar Jasika
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Zizou Bergs
59%
(
62 of
105)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
93)
18
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
3
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
34 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Jan Choinski
71%
(
72 of
102)
1st Serve %
74%
(
92 of
125)
16
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
59 of
92)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
30 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
51 of
125)
123
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(3) 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Zizou Bergs
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Zizou Bergs
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Omar Jasika
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
82%
(
58 of
71)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Zizou Bergs
63%
(
85 of
136)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
128)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
36%
(
49 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
49 of
128)
136
Total Points Won
128
|
6-3 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Purcell Vs Bergs Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Purcell are available here and Bergs photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Max Purcell
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Zizou Bergs
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
